Ops's profileOperational SecurityPhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Operational Security

G Spot

Ops

Occupation
Location
Interests
Remaining Internal... Using Encryption... Countering Intel... What you know about dat?

Video

Loading...

Quote of the Day

Loading...

Weather

Loading...
Plexus_003
The Kingdom
Blood Diamond
Gladiator
Troy
Saw II
300
Photo 1 of 22

Universal Video

Loading...

Solitaire / Patience

Loading...

Stock Quote

Loading...

Babylon Box

Loading...

Horoscopes

Loading...

Video

No content has been added yet.
Photo 1 of 41

Custom HTML

June 03

JavaScripts, Add-ons, Active X scripts, Viruses, Trojans and Worms... What do they all have in common?

JavaScripts, Add-ons, Active X Scripts, Viruses, Trojans and Worms. What do they all have in common?
 
   
 JavaScripts, Add-ons, Active X Scripts, Viruses, Trojans and Worms. What do they all have in common?
 

As of now over 45,000 Web sites have been hacked to redirect unwitting victims to another web site that tries to infect PCs with malicious software, according to security vendor Websense.

The affected sites have been hacked to host JavaScript code that directs people to fake Google Analytics web site, which provides data for web site owners on a site's usage, then to another bad site. This was from Carl Leonard, threat research manager for Websense.

Those web sites have likely been hacked via a

SQL injection attack, in which improperly configured web applications accept malicious data and get hacked. Another possibility is that the FTP credentials for the sites have somehow been obtained by hackers, giving them access to the inner workings of the site. It appears the hackers are using automated tools to seek out vulnerable web sites.

The latest campaign underscore the success hackers have at hosting dangerous code on poorly secured web sites Once a user has been directed to the bogus Google analytics site, it redirects again to another malicious domain. That site tests to see if the PC has software vulnerabilities in either Microsoft’s' Internet Explorer browser or Firefox that can be exploited in order to deliver malware.

If it doesn't find a problem there, it will launch a fake warning saying the computer is infected with malware and tries to get the user to willingly download a program that purports to be security software but is actually a Trojan downloader. Those fake security programs are often called "scareware" and don't work as advertised.

As of last Friday, only four of 39 security software programs could detect that Trojan, although that's now likely changed as vendors such as Websense swap malware samples with other companies in order to improve overall Internet Security. Its not clear what the hackers are doing with the newly compromised PC's although it's possible they can be configured to send spam, become part of a botnet or have data stolen from them.

The malicious domain serving up the malware is hosted in the Ukraine, the same region where notorious Russian Business Network (RBN) operated. RBN is a gang of cyber criminals involved in phishing campaigns and other malicious activity. That web site appeared to be down as of Tuesday afternoon. The RBN is thought to be inactive now.

"Whether this is a part of that group or whether it's a copycat using some of the techniques that are similar to those used by the malware group in the past we are not quite certain yet," Leonard. "its very difficult to pinpoint the exact people behind this."

Since so many web sites have been hacked to deliver the attack, it's nearly impossible to contact them all.

Websense said the latest attacks don't appear to be related to Gumblar, a malware campaign under way last month. Gumblar resulted in at least 3,000 web sites getting infected with malicious code that scanned users computers for vulnerabilities in

Adobe Systems software.

Once on a PC, Gumblar steals FTP log-in credentials, using that information to help spread to other computers. It also commandeers a person's web browser and replaces Google search results with other dangerous links.

Knowledge Is Power...

...Don't Have It Used Against You!

http://OpSec.spaces.live.com

April 09

Counter Ops: The Petition (Declassfied)

DECLASSIFIED

COUNTER OPS

Case No. xxxxxxxxxx

Now comes

Marcus xxxxxx Vs Deborah xxxxxxxx

 

1. The Petitioner Acknowledges paternity Chapter 45(a) Utah Ann Code, of minor child and implore the courts to understand that the minor child Jhaniqua has lived with both the Petitioner and Respondent from the time she was born until Dec 7, 2005.

Critical Time Frame

Family Photos

Medicaid Documents from Monroe County and Public Assistance.

Household bills and utilities

Household income and tax records

Bank Statements

 

2. With careful thought the Respondent’s reluctance to divulge the whereabouts of the minor child to the petitioner, the Respondent has not made any attempt in contacting known points of contact to the Petitioner; to continue, The Respondent’s point of contacts were reluctant to divulge our minor child whereabouts.

the Respondent’s family was and still is reluctant in telling me of our minor child whereabouts. If they had it there way the Petitioner would never have seen or spoken to our minor child's ever again and have not only shown that by not telling me where to find our minor child but also; by when the Petitioner's sister went to their door and them denying they heard from her which was not the case because she had used the petitioner’s phone to call her parents and her proctor parents before she left. Plus the police found that she had traveled to Utah and why wouldn’t she at least tell either family that she had arrived?

The Petitioner did not know where their minor child was living and did not make a conscience effort not to call or find their minor child's.

The Petitioner couldn’t call simply because the only point of contact he had was disconnected and like before her family were and still are reluctant in telling me anything about both the Respondent and minor child whereabouts and or status.

The Respondent made a conscience effort in leaving NY state!

 

3. Both the Petitioner and Respondent were both residents of Rochester, NY and we both took care of minor child Jhaniuqa jointly in respect to domestic allocation of sharing child care costs, household bills & utilities and providing nourishment love and care for their minor child jointly.

Family Pictures

Utility & household records

Asset records

Employment records

4. The Respondent is indeed the biological mother; however, the minor child WAS NOT born in Weber county! The Petitioner is exercising his right under Utah Code 78b-14-301 to bring this proceeding to the court. In fact their minor child was born at Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, NY on February 5, 2003.

Birth Certificate

Acknowledgement of Paternity

Two witness signatures

5. Indeed I am the biological father.

Birth Certificate

Family Photos

6. The Petitioner respectfully requests the Court to grant Joint Legal custody so that the Petitioner may take part in decision making choices regarding their minor child; in response to, the Respondent making a conscience effort to leave without notice or permission from the Petitioner and Respondent’s home in Rochester, NY 14621 on

December 7, 2005.

Tangible Documents and or Materials from Domestic property.

 

7, 8, 9. Again with respect,

Made initial contact with the Respondent December 26, 2005 and she briefly let me speak to their minor child then quickly says she’s busy or does not have time terminating the transmission.

She has made no effort in attempting to contact the Petitioner or his family even though on December 15th & 20, 2005 the Petitioner's sister Crystal has given residents at XXX W. XXXX S. Clearfield, Utah (the Respondent’s Parents) and XXXX S. XXXXXXXX Dr Roy, Utah (Mark & Angela XXXXXXX XXX.XXX.XXXX) the Petitioner's contact information and implored them to relay it to the Respondent.

Mark & Angela XXXXXXX were the Respondent’s Proctor parents and having the Respondent reside with them while the Respondent was in the system. There’s a well documented fact of this in Davis County Juvenile records and indubitably the Respondent knows the individuals and they her because she called them on the Petitioners cell phone.

The Petitioner has physically been at the residence of the Respondent’s Proctor at XXXX S. XXXXXXX Dr. Roy, Utah, a few times throughout 2002.

Internet search on cell phone number yielded XXXX S. XXXXXXXX Dr Roy, Utah.

Crystal XXXX has also relayed the Petitioner's communication information through to these individuals at the residence of both XXX W. XXXX S. Clearfield, Utah and XXXX S. XXXXXXXX Dr. Roy, Utah, to desperately get it to the Respondent.

Again with the reluctance and these two phone numbers and contacts were the Petitioner's only link to the Respondent.

Jan 2006. Received contact from the Respondent after trying for 3 days (585 area code). The Respondent agreed verbally to have Jhaniqua spend the summers with me in NY, that the traveling expenses for Jhaniqua will be shared or deducted from child support and to claim her on the Petitioner's taxes every even year. Again I could only speak to Jhaniqua briefly because the Respondent would claim she’s busy and has to go.

Attempts from Jan 2006 - March 2006 it was all the same, initial conversations that were brief and interrupted on the Respondent’s behalf

In between these communications the Respondent and the Petitioner have spoken to each other and the Petitioner relayed contact information to his mother Christine XXXX of Salt Lake City.

March 2006 the Respondent’s phone number is disconnected; thus, severing the only direct line the Petitioner had to the Respondent.

From March 2006 to December 2007, The Petitioner attempted to send emails and or place calls to both her parents & proctor parents to a blind eye and a deaf ear.

 

XXXXXXXXXX@netscape.net (the Respondent’s Father & Mother e-mail contact) Sent 11/9/2007 6:30 PM

Its wrong for you not to relay the Petitioner's message... I know where you guys are at. All I want to do is see my daughter. Can you please tell your daughter the XXXX X XXXXX to contact me ASAP... Its very important regarding her healthcare coverage.

585.XXX.XXXX

I hope you can put everything aside for a second and realize that regardless of the fact we are no longer together, or what you may think of me... Its wrong to keep Jhaniqua from the other half of her family.

Regards,

XXXXXXXXX@netscape.net (the Respondent’s Father & Mother e-mail contact) & XXXXXXXXX@comcast.net (the Respondent’s Proctor Parents e-mail contact) Sent (9/21/2007 3:16 PM)

Please have the XXXXXXXX respond to this ASAP...

Regards,

The Respondent has been living in UT for a number of years and has made no effort in having the minor child Jhaniqua see the Petitioner’s mother; to continue, The Petitioner’s mother has not changed her contact information in over 7 years.

March 2008 the Petitioner made contact with the Respondent through web search and the Respondent agreed verbally to have Jhaniqua spend the summers with me in NY, that the traveling expenses for Jhaniqua will be shared or deducted from child support and to claim her on the Petitioner's taxes every even year. Again like before a brief conversation with Jhaniqua that would be interrupted on the Respondents behalf.

 

From March 2008 - July 2008 The Petitioner has spoken to Jhaniqua a few times. These few times were often scarce due to Respondents reluctance to let the Petitioner speak with their minor child Jhaniqua more often.

 

August 2008 the web search phone number to the Respondent link was disconnected.

 

From August 2008 to January, 2009 and after searching by the only means the Petitioner can which led him to the Respondent after the link was severed then August 2008.

A web search indicated movement and at the same time XXXXXXX who is the Petitioner‘s ORS worker for Davis County is no longer on the case. The Petitioner has been working with her to rid the NY State Offset program; so respectfully he can pay bills on time, not get evicted from the residence, and keep the NYS drivers license, then the case is transferred to Weber County.

 

That let the Respondent to concentrate his research in Weber County, Utah and the Respondent found possible contact information through Weber County public records which led him to the XXXXXXX family and ORS Case XXXXXXXXXX now comes XXXXXXXXXX .

 

Researching the XXXXXXX family online and cross referencing it to the Respondent; thus, XXXXXX E XXXX S, Huntsville, UT. The Respondent used a primitive search pattern on Huntsville, Utah’s demographics on schools. The fact stands that Respondent lives in Huntsville, Utah and the school is within 10 miles of the residence.

XXXXX XXXXX Elementary School’s Phone book capitulates:

XXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXX E XXXX S Huntsville 84317 XXX.XXX.XXXX; thus, completing the link to the Respondent.

February 5, 2009 the Petitioner called the number at the Property and the Respondent answered. The Respondent agreed verbally to have Jhaniqua spend the summers with me in NY, that the traveling expenses for Jhaniqua will be shared or deducted from child support and to claim her on the Petitioner's taxes every even year. That day the Petitioner spoke to Jhaniqua for over 30 minutes without interruption.

From February 5, 2009 to February 20, 2009, the Respondent would briefly let the Petitioner speak to Jhaniqua due to the fact that the Respondent had claimed she had to go.

March 3, 2009 Layton Hills Mall, Layton, Utah The Respondent and their Minor Child were there and for the first time had Jhaniqua see the other side of her family since 2007. The Petitioner was also there to bond with Jhaniqua because of their brief interrupted conversations over the years and with the Respondent “sheltering” her from the Petitioner; thus, “pushing” her away from the Petitioner. The Respondent agreed verbally to have Jhaniqua spend the summers with me in NY, that the traveling expenses for Jhaniqua will be shared or deducted from child support and to claim her on the Petitioner's taxes every even year and to meet again at the mall the following day March 4, 2009.

10. The minor child was born in the state of NY. [Domestic Relations Article 5-1 Title 1 subtitle 75-E NY Law:]

75-e. Effect of child custody determination. A child custody determination made by a court of this state that had jurisdiction under this article binds all persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of this state or notified in accordance with section 75-g of this title or who have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and who have been given an opportunity to be heard. As to those persons, the determination is conclusive as to all decided issues of law and fact except to the extent the determination is modified or except to the extent that enforcement of an order would violate subdivision 1-c of section 240 of this chapter or section 1085 of the family court act.

She made a choice to leave the state of NY without a word, permission or utterance; thus, severing the link and bond the Petitioner had to Jhaniqua. The Petitioner and the Respondent lived in the state of NY together from February 1, 2003 - December 7, 2005.

Domestic Relations Article 5-1 Title 1 Sub Title 75-I:

§ 75-i. Communication between courts. 1. A court of this state may communicate and, pursuant to subdivision four of section seventy-six-c, subdivision two of section seventy-six-e and section seventy-seven-f of this article, must communicate, with a court in another state concerning a proceeding arising under this article. 2. The court may allow the parties to participate in the communication. If the parties are not able to participate in the communication, they must be given the opportunity to present facts and legal arguments before a decision on jurisdiction is made. 3. Communication between courts on schedules, calendars, court records, and similar matters may occur without informing the parties. A record need not be made of the communication. 4. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision three of this section, a record must be made of a communication under this section. The parties must be informed promptly of the communication and granted access to the record. 5. For the purposes of this section, "record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.

The Petitioner has Petitioned the NY courts for custody, administrative child support review and visitation in 2007 and 2008, all were dismissed due to the Petitioner needed to bring all matter’s relevant to the petition to a court where child support Case No. XXXXXXXX originated then case worker XXXXXX of Davis County June 2006 and also the location of then the Respondent XXXXXXX. Also the Respondent was on Public assistance in Monroe County from 2003 - 2006, I ask the court in reference to DOM Article 5-1 Title 1 sub 75i to communicate with Monroe County Clerk Cheryl Dionolfo’s office thus validating the Respondent’s New York State residency.

Domestic Relations Article 5-A Title 1 Sub Title 75-J; New York Law:

§ 75-j. Taking testimony in another state. 1. In addition to other procedures available to a party, a party to a child custody proceeding may offer testimony of witnesses who are located in another state, including testimony of the parties and the child, by deposition or other means allowable in this state for testimony taken in another state. The court on its own motion may order that the testimony of a person be taken in another state and may prescribe the manner in which and the terms upon which the testimony is taken. 2. A court of this state may permit an individual residing in another state to be deposed or to testify by telephone, audiovisual means, or other electronic means before a designated court or at another location in that state. A court of this state shall cooperate with courts of other states in designating an appropriate location for the deposition or testimony and the procedures to be followed by the persons taking such deposition or testimony. Any such testimony or deposition shall be recorded and preserved for transcription. 3. Documentary evidence transmitted from another state to a court of this state by technological means that do not produce an original writing may not be excluded from evidence on an objection based on the means of transmission.

Also the Petitioner beseech the courts to also contact the Rochester Police Department where the Petitioner called local police to report Jhaniqua R. XXXXX, the Respondent and all; all, of the items missing from their home.

The Rochester Police Department dispatched an officer who came to the residence of XXX XXXXX St. Rochester, NY in the evening of December 7, 2005, county dispatch records if obtained will reveal this hard and difficult fact to articulate that the Petitioner’s family and items all missing.

Dispatch records will substantiate this fact but the matter was not pursued due to the fact that both the Petitioner and Respondent lived at XXX XXXXX St. Rochester, NY and no custody order then and until now.

11. The Petitioner asks the courts to have both the Petitioner and the Respondent in sharing traveling expenses for their minor child and or to have traveling expenses for the minor child deducted from arrears child support on the Petitioner‘s behalf.

12. The Respondent is married and currently living with her husbands parents in their basement at property XXXX E. XXXX S. in Huntsville, Utah. The fact has been and is now, that at times when the Petitioner had no employment, physically and legally responsible for two minor children of his own to support, child support was still due, the Petitioner had to make ends meet; respectively, the Respondent should do the same.

The Respondent decided to leave the state of NY and “start over” if one calls what she did by leaving the state to begin with; thus, knowing full well of her own financial means and had ample time to plan ahead for times of unemployment as the Petitioner had then and is now.

13. The Earnings information regarding the Petitioner and Respondent supported by employer statements, tax returns, pay check stubs, year-to-date earnings, or records maintained by the Department of Workforce Services indicates minimum level of support required by Utah’s Child Support Guidelines pursuant to Utah code Annotated 78B-12-201 through 78B-12-219.

NY Offset Program garnishes + $200 of current support order.

ORS Case No. XXXXXXXX is $249 per month and with NY Offset program it is $449 with immediate asset freeze and suspension of NY drivers license.

The Petitioner has petitioned NY courts for change several times at which each Judge told the Petitioner that he needs to take the matter to a court with original jurisdiction.

The Petitioner has year-to-date earnings reports as well as tax records to show the courts that he no longer makes the income as he did back in 2006.

That led the Petitioner to XXXXXX XXXX with Davis County ORS who eliminated the NY Offset Program so that he can pay the state of Utah directly for then current child support order Case No. XXXXXXX September 2007.

The Petitioner asks the court to asses both the Petitioner and Respondents household income as the Petitioner did for the new child support revisions, these revisions are in accordance to Utah code Annotated 78B-12-201 through 78B-12-219 but these revisions lack the Respondents household income. The fact stands, that the recalculated Child Support order reflects the Petitioners year-to-date household income in accordance to 78B-12-201 - 78B-12-219 Utah Ann Code.

14. From 2006 to present time the Respondent has worked and neglected to inform ORS of any new relocation or income changes greater than 33%. Tax returns, consumer reports and records from the Department of Workforce Services from ORS’s investigation substantiates this fact; thus, she withheld information from government agencies when receiving Child Support from the state of Utah. Thus the Petitioner is appealing that an adjustment to the arrears child support order be made by looking at past tax records of then the Respondent XXXXXX now the Respondent XXXXX to adjustment fairly and justly. Also seeing that at the time ORS did not know she was married and thus did not adjust for her new household income by not only looking at her past income but her household’s as well just as ORS has done with the Petitioner‘s household income to recalculate minimum support granted Case No. XXXXXXX.

The Respondent has been married since 2007 and the Petitioner politely request that the courts change the respondents name on Case No. XXXXXXXXXX to the Respondent XXXXXXXX.

The Respondent has claimed Jhaniqua on her tax returns since she left the Petitioner asks the courts to allow the Petitioner to claim Jhaniqua on his tax returns for the next 4 years and then even years after which. Doing this will benefit both parties because after the first year the Petitioner will be able to claim Jhaniqua on his taxes the Federal Offset program will grant ORS the remaining balance arrears balance Case No. XXXXXXXXX. I also ask that if the courts decide to split the refund, the Petitioner get back ½ of all past refunds for Jhaniqua that respondent received in the past 4 years by payment installments or it be subtracted from arrears child support on Case No. XXXXXXXX.

15. The Respondent claims she’s unable to work, why would she need a baby sitter for Jhaniqua? When she does return to work, child support should be recalculated to reflect both the Petitioner and Respondents current living conditions and household income; to continue, when the Respondent returns to work, any child care expenses incurred to the Petitioner should be deducted from child support order. Or child can be continued to be watched by her grandmother on Respondents side or by Respondents mother in law as usual.

16. I believe Jhaniqua is on Medicaid in the state of Utah. I ask the courts to commission and investigation into the Respondent’s public assistance grants, medical, food, to verify if she is in fact on Public assistance; and if true, the case evaluated due to the fact that at some point she returned to work while receiving child support that isn’t recalculated, is married, does not live where she is leading everyone to believe and is not living in poverty. Title 63G-11-104 Utah Ann Code:

The Petitioner also asks the courts to query child support payments to the Respondent and scrutinize if it is indeed benefiting the child and not the Respondent. The Petitioner ask that because when seeing the minor child and speaking with Respondent; it was let known, that all her clothes were hand me downs from her sister XXXXXX. I am not saying that there is anything wrong with that but which is more important a child having a four wheeler or clothes not frivolous things like four wheelers, and payments on a truck she will not be able to drive until she‘s at least 16 years old.

17. The Respondent knew full well of her own financial situation, means, or lack there of and made a conscience decision to hire an attorney when the fact stands, the Respondent knew she couldn’t afford one.

Let the truth stand that the Respondent hired XX XXXXX at least two days before the Petitioner filed court documents and that the Petitioner also cannot afford an attorney and did not hire one.

Wherefore, the Petitioner respectfully requests the following stipulations:

1. The Petitioner implores the courts to acknowledge the above facts that reflect the Respondents reluctance to maintaining communication with the Petitioner and their minor child. That it should be taken into consideration that the Respondent has withheld financial information changes to government agencies when receiving benefits and or Child Support, that ORS’s own investigation into both the Petitioner and Respondents income be considered; thus, maintaining XXX X XXXXX assessment into the minimum child support with respect to Utah Child Support Guidelines pursuant to Utah code Annotated 78B-12-201 through 78B-12-219.

2. In reference to Domestic Relations Article 5-1 Title 1 Sub Title 75-I; NY Law: that the minor child was born in the state of NY at Strong Memorial Hospital and both the Petitioner and Respondent resided in the state of NY together and the Petitioner requests the courts to reference DOM Article 5-1 title 1 Subtitle 75-I to communicate with NY courts and county records to establish residency on the Respondent.

3. In reference to DOM Article 5-1 Title 1 Subtitle 75-E; NY Law: since there was no established custody in the state of NY or UT and since both the Petitioner and Respondent resided in the state of NY; they both have the same rights when it comes to their minor Child. Because the Respondent made a conscience choice to leave and thus stripping the Petitioner’s physical rights over their minor child… The Petitioner request that the court grant Joint Legal custody so that the Petitioner can be involved in decision making choices regarding their minor Child.

The Petitioner also request the court grant Joint Physical custody with the exception that the minor child Jhaniqua can still live in the state of Utah and still attend school in the state of Utah but spend the summers and two major holidays with the Petitioner respectfully. Also, that the Respondent cannot move out of the state of Utah without notifying the Petitioner and the courts.

4. Over the years the Petitioner has been cut short when attempting to establish a bond with the minor child in part on the Respondents schedule, being too busy, or being just vindictive towards the Petitioner when requesting more time; thus, sheltering any bond the Petitioner has established with their minor child.

The Petitioner also requests the relocation statute 30-3-35 (Utah ann code) be relinquished in this preceding because the Petitioner has been cut short from the minor child over the years and is by no means capable to moving to the state of Utah. The Petitioner lives in the state of NY and DOM Article 5-1 Title 1 Subtitle 75-I should be considered since both the Petitioner and Respondent lived in the state of NY for over 2 years before the respondent decided to leave with our minor child without notice.

5. Parent time should be granted in both the State of NY and the state of UT simply because the minor child has lived in NY and has a lot of family that miss her. The Respondent should pay traveling expenses to NY for parent time just as the Petitioner has already traveled to UT for parent time; which was interrupted prematurely on the Respondents behalf and reluctance to extend the Petitioner’s visits. The Petitioner also requests the courts to consider, that the Respondent should pay for return travel expenses for their minor child Jhaniqua and that the Petitioner should pay for acquiring the minor child Jhaniqua.

6. Child Support Guidelines pursuant to Utah code Annotated 78B-12-201 through 78B-12-219 states minimum child support obligation be granted. ORS’s own investigation proves this referencing Case No. XXXXXXXX.

7. From 2006 to present time the Respondent has worked and neglected to inform ORS of any new relocation or income changes greater than 33%. Tax returns, consumer reports and records from the Department of Workforce Services from ORS’s investigation substantiates this fact; thus, she withheld information from government agencies allegedly receiving benefits in violation of 63G-11-104 Utah Ann Code. The Respondent has also claimed Jhaniqua on her tax return for over 4 years and also received tax offsets from the Petitioner.

The Petitioner requests the courts to grant him tax deductions for minor child for the next 4 years and even years after which.

8. If and when the Respondent returns to work she will have her or her husbands grandparents watch the minor child as they have been doing for over 4 years. If there is a daycare I request the courts audit that day care to make sure it has no XXXXXX or XXXXXXX’s family ties as the Petitioner suspects they will overcharge.

9. The Respondent hired XX XXXXX at least a two days before and the Petitioner served XX XXXX court papers March. 5th 2009. On March 4th, 2009 the Responded was not at Layton Hills mall she was at XX XXXXX’s office; to continue, the Respondent knew full well of her own financial situation or lack there of. The Petitioners defense is that the Respondent should have exercised her better financial judgment and not hire an attorney when she knew she could not afford one to begin with.

 

Knowledge Is Power...

...Don't Have It Used Against You!

http://OpSec.spaces.live.com

March 27

Some People Never Change...

Some People Never Change...
 
Ok well most of you know that I have a daughter Jhaniqua... Well I actually tracked her mother down to Huntsville, UT and well she wasn't too thrilled that I actually found her ass. To give you a brief history, we were together for the first 2 1/2 years of our daughter's (Jhaniqua) life. Long story short the relationship was going downhill but before we could ever have a sit down she up and left. Just like that, left and fled the state with our daughter. About a year after that I located her and told her that I would like to see her and everything and for the most part things seemed ok (being able to see her and all). The next day I call the number is disconnected.... WTF right... why are some women like that for real? To put it blunt the mother does not want our daughter Jhaniqua to even remember who I am nor have her spend time with me because we are no longer together...
 
Well I know where she lives so I booked a flight and now I'm on my way...
 
Anyway back to the present.. I located her and told her that I would like to be a part of her life (paying child support since 2006) and I have a right to see her. We met at Layton HIlls Mall in Layton, Utah.
She was a bit nervous at first but soon realized who I was and was very happy to see me.
But of course the mother wasn't too happy that our daughter Jhaniqua was spending quality time with her father. So I asked if I can see her again the following day and she agreed... That was far from the truth... Instead she hired an attorney and is going for Sole Physical and Legal Custody and trying to have her (the grandparents) file Title 30-5-35 Utah Ann Code (grandparents rights for visitation)....
 
Now hold up... She got an attonrey... oh its on... I went to the second district court in Weber County Utah and filed a counterclaim so now the battle is on...
 
 
October 17

Wireless Hacking 101

Wireless Hacking Techniques
 

A typical hacker attack is not a simple, one-step procedure. It is rare that a hacker can get online or dial up on a remote computer and use only one method to gain full access. It is more likely that the attacker will need several techniques used in combination to bypass the many layers of protection standing between them and root administrative access. Therefore, as a security consultant or network administrator, you should be well versed in these occult techniques in order to thwart them.

1118557-L

The following techniques are not specific to wireless networks. Each of these attacks can take multiple forms, and many can be targeted against both wired and wireless networks. When viewed holistically, your wireless network is just another potential hole for a hacker.

The stereotyped image conjured up by most people when they hear the term "hacker" is that of a pallid, atrophied recluse cloistered in a dank bedroom, whose spotted complexion is revealed only by the unearthly glare of a Linux box used for port scanning with Perl. This mirage might be set off by other imagined features, such as dusty stacks f Dungeons and Dragons lore from the 1980s, empty Jolt Cola cans, and Japanese techno music streaming from the Net.

However, although computer skill is central to a hacker's profession, there are many additional facets that he must master. In fact, if all you can do is point and click, you are a script kiddie, not a hacker. A real hacker must also rely on physical and interpersonal skills such as social engineering and other "wet work" that involves human interaction. However, because most people have a false stereotype of hackers, they fail to realize that the person they are chatting with or talking to on the phone might in fact be a hacker in disguise. In fact, this common misunderstanding is one of the hackers' greatest assets.

Social Engineering

Social engineering is not unique to hacking. In fact, many people use this type of trickery every day, both criminally and professionally. Whether it be haggling for a lower price on a lawn mower at a garage sale, or convincing your spouse you really need that new toy or outfit, you are manipulating the "target." Although your motives might be benign, you are guilty of socially engineering the other party.

The Virtual Probe

One example of social engineering that information technology managers face on a weekly basis is solicitation from vendors. An inimical form of sales takes the form of thinly disguised telemarketing. Straying far from ethical standards or sales technique, such vendors will attempt to trick you into giving them information so they can put your company's name on the mailing list.

Now, this sounds innocent enough, and there are probably many that fall for this tactic. However, they are simply trying to trick you into providing sensitive information-information that they really have no business knowing.

Like the scam artist, a hacker often uses similar techniques. A popular method that hackers use is pretending to be a survey company. A hacker can call and ask all kinds of questions about the network operating systems, intrusion detection systems (IDS's), firewalls, and more in the guise of a researcher. If the hacker was really malicious, he could even offer a cash reward for the time it took for the network administrator to answer the questions. Unfortunately, most people fall for the bait and reveal sensitive network information. 

Just recently David Kernell, 20, of Knoxville, faces up to 5 years in prison for hacking into Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's personal e-mail account gov.palin@yahoo.com, on September 16 after correctly answering a series of personal questions, hence The Virtual Probe.

Lost Password

One of the most common goals of a hacker is to obtain a valid user account and password. In fact, sometimes this is the only way a hacker can bypass security measures. If a company uses firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and more, a hacker will need to borrow a real account until he can obtain a root access and set up a new account for himself. However, how can a hacker get this information? One of th easiest ways is to trick someone into giving it to them.

For example, many organizations use a virtual private network (VPN) that enables remote employees to connect to the network from home and essentially become a part of the local network. This is a very popular method of enabling people to work from home, but it is also a potential weak spot in any security perimeter. As VPN's are set up and maintained by the IT department, hackers will often impersonate an actual employee and ask one of the IT staff for the password by pretending to have lost the settings. If the IT employee believes the person, he willingly and often gladly hands over the keys. Presto! The hacker now can connect from anywhere on the Internet and use an authorizes account to work his way deeper into the network. Imagine if you were the lowly IT staff person on call and the CEO rang you up at 10:30p.m. Irate about a lost password. Would you want to deny him /her access, risking the loss of your job? Probably not, which makes this type of fear a hackers best friend.

0c900d0f43ad

Chatty Techniques

If you are a home user and think you have nothing to fear from this type of impersonation, think again-you are actually targeted more often by scammers and hackers alike: This is because many Internet newcomers (newbies) will believe anything someone appearing to be their ISP's tech support personnel tells him. For example, hackers will often send out mass messages to people, or sit in chat rooms and wait for a newbie to come along. They will then set up a fake account or use simple tricks to make it appear as if an AOL employee is chatting with them. What the newbies do not realize is that they are actually talking with the hacker. In disguise. So, they willingly hand over anything from credit cards to user names and passwords.

Social Spying

Social spying is the process of “using observation to acquire information.” Although social engineering can provide a hacker with crucial information, small businesses are better protected against social engineering because many people in very small companies know each other. For example, if one of the IT staff received a call from a hacker pretending to be a distressed CEO, he would probably recognize the voice as not belonging to the real CEO. In this case, social spying becomes more important.

To illustrate one of the nontechnical ways social spying can be used, consider how many people handle ATM cards. For example, do you hide your PIN when you take money out at the ATM? Take note of how people protect their PIN the next time you are in line at the ATM. You will probably note most people do not care. Most people will whip out their card and punch the numbers without a care for how could be watching. If the wrong person memorized the PIN, he would have all the information needed to access the funds in the account, provided he could first the his hands on the ATM card. Thus, a purse snatcher would not only get the money just withdrawn from an ATM, but could easily go back and withdraw the entire day's limit.

Similarly, hackers socially spy on users as they enter passwords. A “flower delivery” at 8:00a.m. In the morning would give a hacker the necessary excuse to casually stroll through an office building. Although she appears to be looking for the recipient of the flowers, she could be watching for people entering passwords or other sensitive information.

In addition to snooping on people as they actively type their user information, most offices have at least several people who are guilty of posting their password on or near their computer monitor. This type of blatant disregard for security is every network administrator's worst nightmare. Regardless of repeated memos, personal visits, and warnings, some people seem to always find an excuse to post their network password right in plain view. Even if some people are at least security-conscious enough to hide their Post-it notes in a discreet place, it still only takes a few seconds to lift up a keyboard or pull open a desk drawer.

If you do not believe this, take a quick walk around and see just how many potential security violations are in your office area. You might be very surprised to see just what type of information is there for the taking!

Garbage Collecting

Have you ever thrown away a credit card statement without shredding it? If so, you are a potential target. Although you might consider your trash to be sacred territory that no one enters because it is dirty, your trash, and the trash of your company, is often a gold mine. Fishing through garbage to find passwords, also know as dumpster diving, can provide a hacker with the crucial information needed to take over your network.

Let's consider a scenario. If you are a network administrator and you receive an anonymous tip that people are posting passwords all around the office, what would you do? Most administrators would immediately investigate and send out a memo to everyone in the company stating that this activity is not allowed, and that violations will be dealt with harshly. Although this might get everyone to temporarily take down their Post-it passwords, the problem has only been exacerbated, for all those passwords are now headed right to the anonymous caller who is waiting at the dumpster.

hacked

In addition to passwords, hackers can find memos, sensitive reports, diskettes, old hard drives, and more in the trash. Imagine the value of an old cash register hard drive could have to a hacker looking for a way to gain access to the company's credit card database. In many cases, a hard drive an simply be installed on another computer and searched using inexpensive (or free) forensic tools.

Sniffing

A sniffer is a program and/or device that monitors all information passing through a computer network. It sniffs the data passing through the network off the wire and determines where the data is going, where it's coming from, and what it is. In addition to these basic functions, sniffers might have extra features that enable them to filter a certain type of data, capture passwords, and more. Some sniffers (for example, the FBI's controversial mass-monitoring tool Carnivore) can even rebuild files sent across a network, such as an email or Web page.

A sniffer is one of the most important information gathering tools in a hacker's arsenal. The sniffer gives the hacker a complete picture (network topology, IP address) of the data sent and received by the computer or network it is monitoring. This data includes, but is not limited to, all email messages, passwords, user names, and documents. With this information, a hacker can form a complete picture of the data traveling on a network, a well as capture important tidbits of data that can help him/her gain complete control over a network.

How Does a Sniffer Work?

For a computer to have the capability to sniff a network, it must have a network card running in a special mode. This is called promiscuous mode, which means it can receive all the traffic sent across the network. A network card will normally only accept information that has been sent to its specific network address. This network address is probably known as the Media Access Control (MAC) address. You can find your own MAC address by going to the Windows Taskbar and clicking Start, then Run and type winipcfg (for Windows 95/98/ME) or ipconfig/all (for Windows NT/2000/.net Server). The MAC address is also called the physical address.

The only exception to this is what is called monitor mode. This type of network card status only applies to wireless network interface cards (NICs). Because of the unique properties of a wireless network, any data traveling through the airwaves is open to any device that is configured to listen. Although a card in promiscuous mode will work in wireless environments, there is no need for it to actually be part of the network. Instead, a WNIC can simply enter a listing status in which it is restricted from sending data out to the network. As some of you already know, a network card in promiscuous mode can be detected because of how it interacts with the network. Monitor mode stops all interaction.

There are different layers involved in network communications. Normally, the Network layer is responsible for searching the packets of information for their destination addresses. This destination address is the MAC address of a computer. There is a unique MAC address for every network card in the world. Although you can change the address, the MAC address ensures that the data is delivered to the right computer. If a computer's address doe not match the address in the packet, the data is normally ignored.

The reason a network card has this option to run in promiscuous mode is for troubleshooting purposes, Normally, a computer does not want or need information to be sent to their computers on the network. However, in the event that something goes wrong with the network wiring or hardware, it is important for a network technician to look inside the data traveling on the network to see what is causing the problem. For example, one common indication of a bad network card is when computers start to have a difficult time transferring data. This could be the result of information overload on the network wires. The flood of data would jam the network and stop any productive communication. After a technician plugs in a computer with the capability to examine the network, he/she would quickly pinpoint the origin of the corrupt data, and thus the location of the broken network card. He/she could then simply replace the bad card and everything would be back to normal.

Another way to visualize a sniffer is to consider two different personality types at a cocktail party. One type is the person who listens and replies to conversations in which he/she is actively involved. This is how a network card is supposed to work on your local machine. It is supposed to listen and reply to information sent directly to it.

On the other hand, there are those people at the party who stand quietly and listen to everyone's conversation. This person could be compared to a network card running in promiscuous mode. Furthermore, if this eavesdropper listened for a specific subject only, he/she could be compared to a sniffer that captures all data related to passwords only.

How Hackers Use Sniffers

As mentioned, sniffers like this are used everyday to troubleshoot faulty equipment and monitor network traffic. Hackers can use this or similar tools to peer inside a network. However, they are not out to troubleshoot. Instead, they are out to glean passwords and other gems.

capture packet

Depending on the program a hacker is using, he will get something that looks like the above picture. As you can see from the screenshot, some data is easily readable, while some data is not. The difference is in the type of data that is sent. Computers can send information either in plain text or in an encrypted form. The same capture shows just how easy it is to read captured pain text data.

Pain text communication is any information that is sent just as it appears to the human eye. For most applications, this is the standard means of data transfer. For example, the Internet uses plain text for most of its communications. This is the fastest way to send data. Chat programs, email, Web pages and a multitude of other programs send their information in plain text. This is acceptable for most situations; however, it becomes a problem when transmitting sensitive information, such as a bank account number or a password.

For example, look at the sniffer screen shot. If you look closely at the plain text selection, you can see just how dangerous a sniffer can be to sensitive information. In the plain text, you can see the following: Our company will be merging with another company. This will make our stock $$. Don't tell anyone. If this were a real merger, a hacker could make millions overnight.

In addition, email clients and FTP clients do not normally encrypt their passwords; this makes them two of the most commonly sniffed programs on a network. Other commonly used programs such as Telnet, Web browsers, and news programs also send their passwords as plain text. So, if a hacker successfully installs a sniffer on your network, he would soon have a list of passwords and user names that he could exploit.

Even some encrypted passwords used in a Windows NT network can be sniffed. Thanks to the rather well-known encryption scheme of an NT password, it does not take long to capture and decrypt more than enough NT passwords to break a network wide open. In fact, there are even sniffing programs that have an NT password cracker built right into them. The programs are designed to be very user friendly so that network administrators can test their networks for weak passwords. Unfortunately, these programs often end up in the hands of script kiddies who can just as easily use them to cause problems.

Although sniffers most commonly show up within closed business networks, they can also be used throughout the Internet. As mentioned previously, the FBI has a program that will capture all the information both coming from and going to computers on line. This tool, previously known as Carnivore, simply has to be plugged in and turned on. Although it is purported to filter out any information that is not the target's, this tool actually captures everything traveling through whatever wire to which it is connected and then filters it according to the rules set up in the program. Thus, Carnivore can potentially capture all those passwords, email messages, and chat sessions passing through its connection.

In addition to wired networks, sniffers can also be used in wireless networks. In effect, a wireless network on a corporate LAN is like putting an Ethernet jack in your parking lot. What makes this unique from a hacker's perspective is that sniffing a wireless network is probably not illegal, although it has yet to be tested in court. In many ways, it is no different than a police scanner used by reporters and hobbyists worldwide. If the information is sent in plain text to the public domain, how can it be wrong to simply listen?

wifi

How to Detect a Sniffer

There are a few ways a network technician can detect a NIC running in promiscuous mode. One way is to physically check all the local computers for any sniffer devices or programs. There are also software detection programs that can scan networks for devices that are running sniffer programs (for example, AntiSniff). These scanner programs use different aspects of the Domain Name Service and TCP/IP components of a network system to detect any malicious programs or devices that are capturing packets (running in promiscuous mode). However, for the average home user, there is really no way to detect whether a computer out on the Internet is sniffing your information. This is why encryption is strongly recommended.

How Can I Block Sniffers?

There is really only one way to protect your information from being sniffed: Use encryption! Using Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protected Web sites and other protection tools, you can encrypt your passwords, email messages and chat sessions. There are many programs available for free that are easy to use. Although you do not always need to protect the information passed during a chat session with your friends, you should at least have the option available when needed.

Because of the very nature of a WLAN, encryption is a must in any situation. Fortunately, wireless networks come with the option of encryption built right into their software.  However, few take advantage of this capability, as few are even aware that this option exists.

 Maximum Wireless Security is available HERE!!!

October 11

WiFi is no longer a viable secure connection

Wi-Fi encryption not safe? WiFi is no longer secure enough to protect wireless data. Global Secure Systems has said that a Russian's firm's use of the latest NVidia graphics cards to accelerate WiFi ‘password recovery' times by up to an astonishing 10,000 per cent proves that WiFi's WPA and WPA2 encryption systems are no longer enough to protect wireless data. David Hobson, managing director of GSS, claimed that companies can no longer view standards-based WiFi transmission as sufficiently secure against eavesdropping to be used with impunity. He also said that the use of VPNs is arguably now mandatory for companies wanting to comply with the Data Protection Act. He said: “This breakthrough in brute force decryption of WiFi signals by Elcomsoft confirms our observations that firms can no longer rely on standards-based security to protect their data. As a result, we now advise clients using WiFi in their offices to move on up to a VPN encryption system as well. “Brute force decryption of the WPA and WPA2 systems using parallel processing has been on the theoretical possibilities horizon for some time - and presumably employed by relevant government agencies in extreme situations - but the use of the latest NVidia cards to speedup decryption on a standard PC is extremely worrying. “The $64,000 question, of course, is what happens when hackers secure a pecuniary advantage by gaining access to company data flowing across a WPA or WPA2-encrypted wireless connection. Will the Information Commissioner take action against the company concerned for an effective breach of the Data Protection Act.”
 
Photo 1 of 20

Google Search Gadget

Loading...
Photo 1 of 49

Science

Loading...Loading...
Thanks for visiting!
Please wait...
Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
Your parent has turned off comments.
Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.
The G Man -wrote:
Hi Ops,
Thanks for passing by and your compliment. Smile
I see your network of friends is 640+ strong, that's great but how do you get the time to get round to all of those peoples spaces??

Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

G.
May 9
The G Man -wrote:
Hi, just passing by.Smile
Apr. 19
taniawrote:

Meu amigo internauta






Você que é meu amigo,
você que sempre me socorre quando preciso,
você que fala de assuntos interessantes
às vezes coisas banais que para mim são tão importantes!
Você, que,
às vezes,
tão longe,
mas que sinto tão perto em meu coração...

Você, meu amigo,
que não vejo os olhos,
mas sinto a alma,
está sempre próximo,
bem mais perto do que a própria tela,
está mais próximo do que imagina...

Você meu amigo,
que invadiu minha vida,
fez-me gostar-te muito,
que não veio apenas através de um cabo telefônico,
mas veio do vento,
vento que nos leva para o encontro das nossas alegrias
para a proximidade dos nossos sonhos.

Você é especial,
e tudo o que se refere à você.

São tão importantes para mim:
as suas alegrias, as suas mágoas, as suas histórias e suas aventuras,
quero-te sempre próximo de mim!

Você meu amigo,
que é muito mais que um encontro virtual,
é a realidade dos meus dias!

Por você eu navego,
por você eu crio,
por você eu tenho suportado tantas coisas,
com tanta força...

A você meu amigo,
gostaria de fazer alguns pedidos:
Que você sempre permaneça,
em minha vida,
em meu coração.

Que seja meu eterno amigo;
além da tela,
além do tempo,
aqui dentro do meu coraçãoCoração partido
Sept. 18
안녕 하세요 ?  잘 보구갑니다 . 나의 아름답고 소중한 친구님 ,, 주말 행복하게 보내세요 ,,,,,,,,,hug,,,,,,,,
Sept. 11
잘 보구감니다 . 나의 아름다운 천사 친구님 . 오늘도 아름다운 시간 보내세요 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,hug,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Aug. 17
잘 보구 감니다 . 나의 소중한 천사 친구님 ,, 아름다운  하루 보내세요 ,,,,,,,,hug,,,,,,,
Aug. 13
ÏñGrÏÐ .wrote:



 

MySpace and Orkut Te Quiero Glitter Graphic - 7

flowers
Te quiero decir muchas cosas por medio de esta carta
y sinceramente te las mereces...
TU AMISTAD VALE MUCHO!

Te quiero decir que si mañana dejo de existir,
te observaré en el cielo, te cuidaré y, sobre todo,
abogaré por aminorar tu sufrimiento.

Te quiero decir que si dejas este mundo,
Dios no lo quiera, te recordaré y siempre te voy a querer,
cada noche hablaré contigo.

Quiero que sepas que te quiero mucho
y eso es algo muy importante para mí,
ya que hay veces que uno cree
que no es conveniente decirlo por cualquier razón.

Sé que debí decirte antes cuánto te aprecio,
pero si por alguna razón no nos volvemos a ver,
te dejo esta nota para que sepas lo mucho que te quiero.

Y si no alcanzaste a decírmelo y yo dejo de existir,
no te preocupes, que por el simple hecho de nuestra amistad
sabré que me aprecias.

Recuerda que nunca sabemos cuándo dejamos de existir,
por eso quiero decirte hoy con esto
¡Que te aprecio mucho!

Con todo mi cariño te deseo un Feliz Fin De Semana. 

Un BesitoPhotobucket

PhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucket Photobucket

flowers

July 4
Maria Belénwrote:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

June 16
Maria Belénwrote:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

HELLO MY FRIEND...I HOPE THAT YOU ´RE VERY WELL
HAVE A SAVE DAY...TAKE CARE...SEE YOU SOON...BEST WISHES FROM SPAIN
May 28
Maria Belénwrote:
6823
May 18


Imagenes para hi5 - suhi5.com
 HOLA SOMOS AMIGOS DE ESPACIO ..PASE A MIRAR UN POCO FELICITACIONES HERMOSA TU CUEVA

CHAU

CAMILA

May 17
ciao BUONA SERATA.....
May 14
Jacobyte .wrote:
The Thistle - National Emblem of Scotland
The Saltire of Scotland Go to Jacobyte's Spaces The Lion Rampant is the flag used historically by the King of Scots.
 
Deutsch  Fran?ais  Espa?ol  Portugu?s  Italiano  Nederlands  ????? Arabic  ?? Chinese 
Failte!  Greetings!
Many thanx for being friends.
Yours aye!  Wink
Jacobyte.
Celtic art is ornamental, avoiding straight lines and only occasionally using symmetry, without the imitation of nature or ideal of beauty central to the classical tradition, but as far as we can understand it often involves complex symbolism.
Click here to go to Jacobyte's Spaces To go to Jacobyte's Spaces
 
'Top Scottish Websites' - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Top Site Directory Scottish Topsites by Scotlinks Scotland Directory
 
counter free hit unique web
May 13
May 12
Maria Belénwrote:
May 11
No namewrote:
http://hacktherazr.com/
Mar. 24
Op. Secwrote:

What's good Rochester?

This is my blog... yeah you may think its "geeky" but just remember this... Knowledge is Power... Don't have it used against you...

I am a freelance/code busta/student/tax payer/full time father who "sniffs" information in the air. You'd be surprised what you can find with a laptop and wireless card. There are wireless networks that are streaming untapped data waiting to be plucked...

Then there are those who say what I do is illegal... well this is how "we" see it...

Lets say we are neighbors....

Lets also say that you've installed a new sprinkler system for your yard...

If some of that water got on my lawn, thus watering my grass... Would you sue me?

Would be illegal for my grass to receive the water from your sprinklers?

It’s the same case with wireless signals... They pass through walls (in this case past fences onto your neighbors yard) which makes it harder for one to locate the point of attack... (clears throat)... point of entry...

If your bold enough to have wireless ENCRYPT YOUR NETWORK at least then it would be harder for people like me to see what's really good between those walls...

Nov. 17